Modified Keystone Flap: A Versatile Reconstruction for Mastectomy Defects – Our Clinical Experience
Keywords:
Keystone, Saucepan, MastectomyAbstract
Introduction: The closure of extensive defects in reconstructive surgery is a common challenge. The keystone flap technique has gained popularity due to its adaptability and reliance on fascia, providing a reliable blood supply and offering a better match for skin color compared to skin grafts. However, keystone flap necrosis can occur due to tension and inadequate tissue perfusion. To address this, a modified keystone flap technique called the "doubled-handle saucepan" was developed, resulting in improved flap vitality and reduced tissue necrosis, particularly in mastectomy defects.
Materials and method: We assessed 16 female patients who underwent “doubled-handle saucepan” keystone flaps after modified radical mastectomy (MRM). The average dimensions of wounds in this study were 23.1 ± 3.8 cm × 16.9 ± 2.9 cm, with the largest defect measuring 28.0 cm × 21.5 cm. The average size of the modified keystone flap was 36.3 ± 3.8 cm × 21.2 ± 2.2 cm.
Results and Discussion: Modified keystone flap demonstrated effective performance in managing extensive defects without any complication. The average operation time in our study was 124.3 ± 11.2 minutes.
Conclusion: The "double-handled saucepan" keystone flap technique is a unique and dependable method derived from the original keystone flap which effectively covers defects and maintains flap vitality without tension by ensuring vascularization at the skin bridge. This modified keystone flap technique proves highly effective for reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy (MRM), offering time efficiency and no need for a secondary donor site makes it an appealing alternative to free flaps or other local flap techniques in many cases.
Downloads
References
1. Hifny MA, Park TH. Customized reconstruction with rotation Hemi-Keystone flap. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21(11):5819-5824
2. Rao AL, Janna RK. Keystone flap: versatile flap for reconstruction of limb defects. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Mar;9(3):PC05-7.
3. Gómez OJ, Barón OI, Peñarredonda ML. Keystone flap: overcoming paradigms. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Mar;7(3):e2126.
4. Aithal SS, Loganathan E, Shekar R. Keystone Island Flap for Reconstructive Surgery-A Novel Approach. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2022 Jul-Sep;15(3):315-318.
5. Aragón-Miguel R, Gutiérrez-Pascual M, Sánchez-Gilo A, Sanz-Bueno J, Vicente-Martin FJ. The Keystone Flap in dermatology: Clinical experience with 18 patients. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas. 2018 Jul 1.
6. Hassani M, Hertess I, Tucker S, Coetzer-Botha M, Kittler H, Rosendahl C. The UQ Flap: A Novel Modification of the Keystone Flap. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Oct
7. 24;10(10):e4619.
8. Hu M, Bordeaux JS. The keystone flap for lower extremity defects. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(3):490-493.
9. Srivastav S, Gupta S, Sharma A. Keystone Flap as a Reconstructive Option for selected areas; A Prospective Study. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Oct;11(Suppl 5):S871-S875.
10. Jovic TH, Jessop ZM, Slade R, Dobbs TD, Whitaker IS. The use of keystone flaps in periarticular wound closure: a case series. Front Surg. 2017.
11. Mehta KB, Sinno S, Spiegel M, Saadeh PB. Perforator Based Fasciocutaneous Flap Reconstruction of Extremity Skin Cancer: A First Choice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Oct;134(4S-1):29.
12. Ebrahimi A, Ashayeri M, Rasouli HR. Comparison of Local Flaps and Skin Grafts to Repair Cheek Skin Defects. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2015 Apr-Jun;8(2):92-96.
13. Sapthavee, A., Munaretto, N., & Toriumi, D. M. (2015). Skin Grafts vs Local Flaps for Reconstruction of Nasal Defects: A Retrospective Cohort Study. JAMA facial plastic surgery, 17(4), 270–273.
14. Reddy KSH, Chittoria RK, Nishad K, Thomas N, Srinath R, et al. Role of Topical Nitroglycerin in Preventing Keystone Flap Necrosis. J Orthop Pract. 2022;2(1).
15. Kim KH, Yoo BW, Lim SY, Oh KS, Kim J, Shin HW, Kim KN. Modified Keystone Perforator Island Flap for Tension-Reducing Coverage of Axillary Defects Secondary to Radical Excision of Chronic Inflammatory Skin Lesions: A Retrospective Case Series. Biomed Res Int. 2022 Sep 29;2022:5600450.
16. Yoon CS, Kong YT, Lim SY, Kim J, Shin HW, Kim KN. A comparative study for
17. tension-reducing effect of Type I and Type II keystone perforator island flap in the human back. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):16699.
18. Ziegler B, Hundeshagen G, Warszawski J, Gazyakan E, Kneser U, Hirche C.
19. Implementation and Validation of Free Flaps in Acute and Reconstructive Burn Care. Med (Kaunas). 2021 Jul 16;57(7):718.
20. Varghese BK, Babu P, Roy T. Microsurgical free muscle flaps for reconstruction of post- traumatic complex tissue defects of foot. Med J Armed Forces India. 2016 Apr;72(2):131- 139.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Anastasia Dessy Harsono, Dominic Melino Tjokrovonco (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
